How to make AI trustworthy in learning environments
Recently, I asked a popular AI system to summarize several books I have written. It performed well, for the most part, but it invented a book out of thin air. The imaginary book sounded interesting, and I may write it someday, but in a research assignment, this would have been a clear failure. The example illustrates a simple truth. AI cannot be accurate without proper guidance.
AI can support research, writing, and analysis, but only when used with clear safeguards. No AI system is perfect, yet we can design prompts that improve accuracy and reduce hallucinations. The most reliable method is to require evidence. Ask the AI to search for current data, provide citations, and explain its reasoning. For complex or controversial topics, request multiple viewpoints to uncover potential bias.
Academic integrity also depends on verification. For any time-sensitive claim or statistical fact, require sources from peer-reviewed journals or government datasets. Then cross-check what matters most. AI should accelerate research, not replace the work of evaluating sources.
The goal is not perfection. The goal is transparency. When AI documents its process, educators can examine the evidence and trust the result.
At the moment, AI tools face the same legitimacy concerns that surrounded Wikipedia nearly twenty years ago. As both tools mature, they gain traction in academic spaces. Yet just as instructors should not accept a copy and paste from Wikipedia, they should not accept an unverified output from any AI chatbot. Both should be viewed as the beginning of research, not the final product.
Posted to LinkedIn
No comments:
Post a Comment